Tariff Rate Comparison
Copper Products| Rate Type |  Chile |  Peru |
|---|---|---|
| MFN Base RateMost Favored Nation tariff | 3.00% | 3.00% |
| Section 122Emergency surcharge (expires ~Jul 24, 2026) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Section 232Steel & aluminum tariff | 50.00% | 50.00% |
| Section 301China-only additional tariff | N/A | N/A |
| Bilateral DealNegotiated rate replaces S122 | N/A | N/A |
| Total Effective Rate | 53.00% | 53.00% |
Rate Comparison by Product Category
| Product | Chile | Peru | Savings ($10K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| copper products | 53.0% | 53.0% | $0 |
| mining equipment | 17.0% | 17.0% | $0 |
| fresh produce | 5.0% | 5.0% | $0 |
| wine spirits | 4.5% | 4.5% | $0 |
| industrial machinery | 17.0% | 17.0% | $0 |
Trade Agreement Status
Chile has no bilateral agreement with the US and faces the standard Section 122 rate of 15% on most imports. Peru has no bilateral agreement with the US and faces the standard Section 122 rate of 15% on most imports. For products under Section 232 national security tariffs, the bilateral deal or Section 122 rate does not apply — S232 rates govern instead. China-origin goods additionally face Section 301 tariffs that stack on top of all other duties, making trade agreement status a defining factor in the total tariff burden.
When to Source from Each Country
Chile offers lower tariff rates across all focus product categories in this comparison, making it the more cost-effective sourcing origin from a tariff perspective. Source from Peru when its supplier relationships, product specialization, or geographic advantages outweigh the tariff cost differential. Always model total landed cost — including freight, insurance, MPF, and HMF fees — before finalizing sourcing decisions.
Full Landed Cost — $10,000 Shipment
Copper ProductsChileFull Landed Cost Breakdown
Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)
PeruFull Landed Cost Breakdown
Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)
Savings Analysis
On a $10,000 shipment of copper products, importing from Chile saves $0 in duties compared to Peru — a 0% reduction in total import costs. Chile incurs $5,592 in duties on the $10,000 shipment, while Peru incurs $5,592. This difference compounds across larger order volumes and is a key factor in supplier selection decisions for importers sourcing copper products.
Frequently Asked Questions
The total effective tariff rate on copper products is 53% from Chile and 53% from Peru under current 2026 tariff policy. These rates include the MFN base rate, applicable Section 122 surcharge or bilateral deal rate, Section 232 duties for covered products, and Section 301 tariffs for Chinese goods. Use the CalcMyTariff.com calculator above to enter your specific invoice value and shipping details for a precise landed cost breakdown.
Chile does not have a formal trade agreement with the United States. Imports from Chile are subject to the standard Section 122 global surcharge of 15% on most goods, stacked on top of MFN base rates.
Peru does not have a bilateral trade agreement with the US. Standard Section 122 surcharge rates apply on top of MFN base rates for imports from Peru.
Chile is cheaper for mining equipment with a 17% total tariff rate, compared to 17% from Peru. On a $10,000 shipment, this 0% rate difference saves $0 in duties when sourcing from Chile.
Section 122, enacted in February 2026 for up to 150 days, imposes a global surcharge on most US imports. Chile is exempt from Section 122 for this product category. Peru is exempt from Section 122 for this product category. Note that Section 122 is scheduled to expire on July 24, 2026 — importers should model both current and post-expiry scenarios when planning shipments.