Colombia vs Mexico: Import Tariff Comparison 2026
Importing coffee tea from Colombia costs 12.5% in total tariffs compared to 10% from Mexico under the current 2026 tariff regime. Mexico offers the lower effective tariff rate at 10%, while Colombia comes in at 12.5%. The Section 122 global surcharge enacted in February 2026 lapsed on July 24, 2026 when its 150-day statutory limit expired; depending on forced-labor Section 301 coverage, goods from Colombia and Mexico may now face a backfilled duty in its place rather than the surcharge itself. The rate differential of 2.5% translates directly into landed cost differences for importers choosing between these two sourcing origins. Understanding the complete tariff stack — MFN base plus special tariffs — is essential for accurate landed cost forecasting when comparing Colombia and Mexico as sourcing options.
Tariff Rate Comparison
Coffee & Tea| Rate Type | ||
|---|---|---|
| MFN Base RateMost Favored Nation tariff | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Section 232Steel & aluminum tariff | N/A | N/A |
| Section 301Unfair-trade action under 19 U.S.C. 2411 | N/A | N/A |
| Section 301 (forced labor)Forced-labor duty applied to covered economies | 12.50% | 10.00% |
| Bilateral DealNegotiated country rate, compared against the other special layers | N/A | N/A |
| Total Effective Rate | 12.50% | 10.00% |
Rate Comparison by Product Category
| Product | Colombia | Mexico | Savings ($10K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| coffee tea | 12.5% | 10.0% | $265 |
| steel iron products | 53.0% | 53.0% | $0 |
| industrial machinery | 14.5% | 12.0% | $265 |
| chemicals industrial compounds | 16.0% | 13.5% | $265 |
| fresh produce | 17.5% | 15.0% | $265 |
Trade Agreement Status
Colombia has no negotiated bilateral rate charged on its goods — any country-specific reciprocal rate it once carried was terminated on February 20, 2026 — and Section 122 lapsed to 0% on July 24, 2026, but Colombia is on the forced-labor Section 301 covered list at the 12.5% tier, with Section 232 goods carved out and the charge on any given product depending on its MFN rate. Mexico is a USMCA member — qualifying goods enter the US duty-free at 0%, and the Section 338 duty that survives a USMCA preference claim applies to Canada only, so it does not reach Mexico. For products under Section 232 national security tariffs, S232 rates govern: a bilateral deal rate does not displace them, and Section 122 never applied to S232-covered goods while it was in force, before it lapsed to zero on July 24, 2026. China-origin goods additionally face Section 301 tariffs that stack on top of all other duties, making trade agreement status a defining factor in the total tariff burden.
When to Source from Each Country
Source from Colombia when importing steel iron products, where its tariff rates are more competitive. Source from Mexico for coffee tea and industrial machinery, where it carries the tariff advantage. Beyond tariff rates, factor in lead times, minimum order quantities, quality standards, and freight costs — the total landed cost comparison may shift depending on shipment volume and logistics conditions.
Full Landed Cost — $10,000 Shipment
Coffee & TeaFull Landed Cost Breakdown
Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)
Full Landed Cost Breakdown
Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)
Savings Analysis
On a $10,000 shipment of coffee tea, importing from Mexico saves $265 in duties compared to Colombia — a 20% reduction in total import costs. Mexico incurs $1,060 in duties on the $10,000 shipment, while Colombia incurs $1,325. This difference compounds across larger order volumes and is a key factor in supplier selection decisions for importers sourcing coffee tea.
Frequently Asked Questions
The total effective tariff rate on coffee tea is 12.5% from Colombia and 10% from Mexico under current 2026 tariff policy. These rates include the MFN base rate, any persisting bilateral deal rate, Section 232 duties for covered products, Section 301 tariffs for Chinese goods, and the forced-labor Section 301 duty that backfills the lapsed Section 122 surcharge for roughly 60 covered economies (Section 122 itself lapsed to 0% on July 24, 2026 and no longer applies). Use the CalcMyTariff.com calculator above to enter your specific invoice value and shipping details for a precise landed cost breakdown.
Colombia does not have a formal trade agreement with the United States. Section 122 lapsed to 0% on July 24, 2026, so imports from Colombia now face either a forced-labor Section 301 duty (if Colombia is on the roughly 60-economy covered list) or the base MFN rate alone with no special-tariff layer.
Yes, Mexico is a USMCA member. Qualifying goods enter the US duty-free at 0%, making Mexico one of the most competitive sourcing origins for tariff purposes. The Section 338 retaliatory duty that survives a USMCA preference claim applies to Canada only and does not reach Mexico. Non-qualifying goods face standard tariff rates.
Colombia is cheaper for steel iron products with a 53% total tariff rate, compared to 53% from Mexico. On a $10,000 shipment, this 0% rate difference saves $0 in duties when sourcing from Colombia.
Section 122, enacted in February 2026 for up to 150 days, imposed a global surcharge on most US imports until it lapsed on July 24, 2026. Section 122 no longer applies to Colombia — it lapsed on July 24, 2026 — but Colombia is on the forced-labor Section 301 covered list at the 12.5% tier, which backfilled the lapsed surcharge. Section 122 no longer applies to Mexico — it lapsed on July 24, 2026 — but Mexico is on the forced-labor Section 301 covered list at the 10% tier, which backfilled the lapsed surcharge. Since the lapse, a forced-labor Section 301 duty (10%/12.5% on ~60 economies) has backfilled the surcharge for most importers — model the realized post-July-24 structure, forced-labor duty included, when planning shipments.
Tariff rates from Tax Foundation, USITC, and Penn Wharton Budget Model; retaliatory and industry data from the ITA Foreign Retaliations Database and U.S. Census Bureau (NAICS). Last verified .