India vs South Korea: Import Tariff Comparison 2026

Both India and South Korea have bilateral trade agreements with the United States, but at different negotiated rates — 18% for India and 15% for South Korea. These bilateral deals replace the standard Section 122 global surcharge, giving these trading partners differentiated tariff treatment compared to countries without formal agreements. For importers of consumer electronics, the total effective rate from India is 19.5% while South Korea comes in at 16.5%. The bilateral frameworks provide a degree of rate certainty, though the legal durability of these deals remains subject to ongoing trade policy developments following the February 2026 IEEPA ruling. Both countries represent more predictable tariff environments than non-deal countries that face the uniform Section 122 rate of 15%.

$317saved on $10k sourcing from South Korea(2.5%)
India
19.5%
VS
South Korea
16.5%

Tariff Rate Comparison

Consumer Electronics
India flag
India
MFN Base Rate1.50%
Section 1220.00%
Section 232N/A
Section 301N/A
Bilateral Deal18.00%
Total19.50%
South Korea flag
South KoreaBest rate
MFN Base Rate1.50%
Section 1220.00%
Section 232N/A
Section 301N/A
Bilateral Deal15.00%
Total16.50%

Rate Comparison by Product Category

ProductIndiaSouth KoreaSavings ($10K)
consumer electronics19.5%16.5%$317
pharmaceutical ingredients20.0%17.0%$317
chemicals industrial compounds21.5%18.5%$317
industrial machinery20.0%17.0%$317
textiles fabrics26.0%23.0%$317

Trade Agreement Status

India has a bilateral deal with the US at 18% (replaces the standard Section 122 rate). South Korea has a bilateral deal with the US at 15% (replaces the standard Section 122 rate). For products under Section 232 national security tariffs, the bilateral deal or Section 122 rate does not apply — S232 rates govern instead. China-origin goods additionally face Section 301 tariffs that stack on top of all other duties, making trade agreement status a defining factor in the total tariff burden.

When to Source from Each Country

South Korea offers lower tariff rates across all focus product categories in this comparison, making it the more cost-effective sourcing origin from a tariff perspective. Source from India when its supplier ecosystem, lead times, quality standards, or logistics infrastructure outweigh the tariff cost difference. Always model total landed cost — freight, insurance, MPF, and HMF — not just tariff rates, before making final sourcing decisions.

Full Landed Cost — $10,000 Shipment

Consumer Electronics
India

Full Landed Cost Breakdown

Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)

Consumer Electronics from India
Results
$12,656.99
Total Landed Cost
Customs Value (FOB + Shipping + Insurance)$10,550.00
MFN Duty (1.50%)$158.25
Bilateral Deal (18.00%)$1,899.00
Total Duties$2,057.25
MPF (0.3464% merchandise processing)$36.55
HMF (0.125% harbor maintenance, ocean)$13.19
Total Fees & Duties$2,106.99
Total Landed Cost$12,656.99
Effective Rate19.50%
South Korea

Full Landed Cost Breakdown

Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)

Consumer Electronics from South Korea
Results
$12,340.49
Total Landed Cost
Customs Value (FOB + Shipping + Insurance)$10,550.00
MFN Duty (1.50%)$158.25
Bilateral Deal (15.00%)$1,582.50
Total Duties$1,740.75
MPF (0.3464% merchandise processing)$36.55
HMF (0.125% harbor maintenance, ocean)$13.19
Total Fees & Duties$1,790.49
Total Landed Cost$12,340.49
Effective Rate16.50%

Savings Analysis

On a $10,000 shipment of consumer electronics, importing from South Korea saves $317 in duties compared to India — a 15.4% reduction in total import costs. South Korea incurs $1,741 in duties on the $10,000 shipment, while India incurs $2,057. This difference compounds across larger order volumes and is a key factor in supplier selection decisions for importers sourcing consumer electronics.

Frequently Asked Questions

The total effective tariff rate on consumer electronics is 19.5% from India and 16.5% from South Korea under current 2026 tariff policy. These rates include the MFN base rate, applicable Section 122 surcharge or bilateral deal rate, Section 232 duties for covered products, and Section 301 tariffs for Chinese goods. Use the CalcMyTariff.com calculator above to enter your specific invoice value and shipping details for a precise landed cost breakdown.

India has a bilateral trade agreement with the US under which a negotiated rate of 18% applies to imports, replacing the standard Section 122 rate. This deal provides more predictable tariff treatment than countries without formal agreements, though its legal durability following the IEEPA ruling remains subject to ongoing policy developments.

South Korea has a bilateral trade deal with the US at a negotiated rate of 15%, which replaces the Section 122 rate for imports from South Korea. This creates a differentiated tariff structure compared to non-deal countries.

South Korea is cheaper for pharmaceutical ingredients with a 17% total tariff rate, compared to 20% from India. On a $10,000 shipment, this 3% rate difference saves $300 in duties when sourcing from South Korea.

Section 122, enacted in February 2026 for up to 150 days, imposes a global surcharge on most US imports. India's bilateral deal rate of 18% replaces the standard Section 122 rate. South Korea's bilateral deal rate of 15% replaces Section 122. Note that Section 122 is scheduled to expire on July 24, 2026 — importers should model both current and post-expiry scenarios when planning shipments.

Disclaimer: CalcMyTariff.com provides tariff estimates for informational purposes only. Actual duty rates depend on the specific HTS classification of your goods, which requires professional customs brokerage expertise. Rates shown reflect our best interpretation of currently published tariff schedules and may not include all applicable duties, anti-dumping duties, countervailing duties, or special tariffs. Consult a licensed US customs broker for binding determinations. Tariff rates change frequently — verify current rates with CBP or USITC before making import decisions.

Tariff rates from Tax Foundation, USITC, and Penn Wharton Budget Model. Last verified March 27, 2026.