South Korea vs Taiwan: Import Tariff Comparison 2026

Both South Korea and Taiwan have bilateral trade agreements with the United States, but at different negotiated rates — 15% for South Korea and 15% for Taiwan. These bilateral deals replace the standard Section 122 global surcharge, giving these trading partners differentiated tariff treatment compared to countries without formal agreements. For importers of semiconductors chips, the total effective rate from South Korea is 25% while Taiwan comes in at 25%. The bilateral frameworks provide a degree of rate certainty, though the legal durability of these deals remains subject to ongoing trade policy developments following the February 2026 IEEPA ruling. Both countries represent more predictable tariff environments than non-deal countries that face the uniform Section 122 rate of 15%.

South Korea
25.0%
VS
Taiwan
25.0%

Tariff Rate Comparison

Semiconductors & Chips
South Korea flag
South Korea
MFN Base Rate0.00%
Section 1220.00%
Section 23225.00%
Section 301N/A
Bilateral Deal15.00%
Total25.00%
Taiwan flag
Taiwan
MFN Base Rate0.00%
Section 1220.00%
Section 23225.00%
Section 301N/A
Bilateral Deal15.00%
Total25.00%

Rate Comparison by Product Category

ProductSouth KoreaTaiwanSavings ($10K)
semiconductors chips25.0%25.0%$0
consumer electronics16.5%16.5%$0
auto parts components28.0%28.0%$0
steel iron products53.0%53.0%$0
industrial machinery17.0%17.0%$0

Trade Agreement Status

South Korea has a bilateral deal with the US at 15% (replaces the standard Section 122 rate). Taiwan has a bilateral deal with the US at 15% (replaces the standard Section 122 rate). For products under Section 232 national security tariffs, the bilateral deal or Section 122 rate does not apply — S232 rates govern instead. China-origin goods additionally face Section 301 tariffs that stack on top of all other duties, making trade agreement status a defining factor in the total tariff burden.

When to Source from Each Country

South Korea offers lower tariff rates across all focus product categories in this comparison, making it the more cost-effective sourcing origin from a tariff perspective. Source from Taiwan when its supplier relationships, product specialization, or geographic advantages outweigh the tariff cost differential. Always model total landed cost — including freight, insurance, MPF, and HMF fees — before finalizing sourcing decisions.

Full Landed Cost — $10,000 Shipment

Semiconductors & Chips
South Korea

Full Landed Cost Breakdown

Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)

Semiconductors & Chips from South Korea
S232 product — excluded from Section 122 surcharge
Section 122 exempt product
Results
$13,237.24
Total Landed Cost
Customs Value (FOB + Shipping + Insurance)$10,550.00
MFN Duty (0.00%)$0.00
Section 232 (25.00%)$2,637.50
Total Duties$2,637.50
MPF (0.3464% merchandise processing)$36.55
HMF (0.125% harbor maintenance, ocean)$13.19
Total Fees & Duties$2,687.24
Total Landed Cost$13,237.24
Effective Rate25.00%
Taiwan

Full Landed Cost Breakdown

Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)

Semiconductors & Chips from Taiwan
S232 product — excluded from Section 122 surcharge
Section 122 exempt product
Results
$13,237.24
Total Landed Cost
Customs Value (FOB + Shipping + Insurance)$10,550.00
MFN Duty (0.00%)$0.00
Section 232 (25.00%)$2,637.50
Total Duties$2,637.50
MPF (0.3464% merchandise processing)$36.55
HMF (0.125% harbor maintenance, ocean)$13.19
Total Fees & Duties$2,687.24
Total Landed Cost$13,237.24
Effective Rate25.00%

Savings Analysis

On a $10,000 shipment of semiconductors chips, importing from South Korea saves $0 in duties compared to Taiwan — a 0% reduction in total import costs. South Korea incurs $2,638 in duties on the $10,000 shipment, while Taiwan incurs $2,638. This difference compounds across larger order volumes and is a key factor in supplier selection decisions for importers sourcing semiconductors chips.

Frequently Asked Questions

The total effective tariff rate on semiconductors chips is 25% from South Korea and 25% from Taiwan under current 2026 tariff policy. These rates include the MFN base rate, applicable Section 122 surcharge or bilateral deal rate, Section 232 duties for covered products, and Section 301 tariffs for Chinese goods. Use the CalcMyTariff.com calculator above to enter your specific invoice value and shipping details for a precise landed cost breakdown.

South Korea has a bilateral trade agreement with the US under which a negotiated rate of 15% applies to imports, replacing the standard Section 122 rate. This deal provides more predictable tariff treatment than countries without formal agreements, though its legal durability following the IEEPA ruling remains subject to ongoing policy developments.

Taiwan has a bilateral trade deal with the US at a negotiated rate of 15%, which replaces the Section 122 rate for imports from Taiwan. This creates a differentiated tariff structure compared to non-deal countries.

South Korea is cheaper for consumer electronics with a 16.5% total tariff rate, compared to 16.5% from Taiwan. On a $10,000 shipment, this 0% rate difference saves $0 in duties when sourcing from South Korea.

Section 122, enacted in February 2026 for up to 150 days, imposes a global surcharge on most US imports. South Korea's bilateral deal rate of 15% replaces the standard Section 122 rate. Taiwan's bilateral deal rate of 15% replaces Section 122. Note that Section 122 is scheduled to expire on July 24, 2026 — importers should model both current and post-expiry scenarios when planning shipments.

Disclaimer: CalcMyTariff.com provides tariff estimates for informational purposes only. Actual duty rates depend on the specific HTS classification of your goods, which requires professional customs brokerage expertise. Rates shown reflect our best interpretation of currently published tariff schedules and may not include all applicable duties, anti-dumping duties, countervailing duties, or special tariffs. Consult a licensed US customs broker for binding determinations. Tariff rates change frequently — verify current rates with CBP or USITC before making import decisions.

Tariff rates from Tax Foundation, USITC, and Penn Wharton Budget Model. Last verified March 27, 2026.