Tariff Rate Comparison
Auto Parts & Components| Rate Type |  GermanyEU bilateral |  Japanbilateral |
|---|---|---|
| MFN Base RateMost Favored Nation tariff | 3.00% | 3.00% |
| Section 122Emergency surcharge (expires ~Jul 24, 2026) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Section 232Steel & aluminum tariff | 25.00% | 25.00% |
| Section 301China-only additional tariff | N/A | N/A |
| Bilateral DealNegotiated rate replaces S122 | N/A | 15.00% |
| Total Effective Rate | 28.00% | 28.00% |
Rate Comparison by Product Category
| Product | Germany | Japan | Savings ($10K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| auto parts components | 28.0% | 28.0% | $0 |
| industrial machinery | 17.0% | 17.0% | $0 |
| consumer electronics | 16.5% | 16.5% | $0 |
| chemicals industrial compounds | 18.5% | 18.5% | $0 |
| pharmaceutical ingredients | 2.0% | 17.0% | $1,583 |
Trade Agreement Status
Germany has no bilateral agreement with the US and faces the standard Section 122 rate of 15% on most imports. Japan has a bilateral deal with the US at 15% (replaces the standard Section 122 rate). For products under Section 232 national security tariffs, the bilateral deal or Section 122 rate does not apply — S232 rates govern instead. China-origin goods additionally face Section 301 tariffs that stack on top of all other duties, making trade agreement status a defining factor in the total tariff burden.
When to Source from Each Country
Germany offers lower tariff rates across all focus product categories in this comparison, making it the more cost-effective sourcing origin from a tariff perspective. Source from Japan when its supplier relationships, product specialization, or geographic advantages outweigh the tariff cost differential. Always model total landed cost — including freight, insurance, MPF, and HMF fees — before finalizing sourcing decisions.
Full Landed Cost — $10,000 Shipment
Auto Parts & ComponentsGermanyFull Landed Cost Breakdown
Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)
JapanFull Landed Cost Breakdown
Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)
Savings Analysis
On a $10,000 shipment of auto parts components, importing from Germany saves $0 in duties compared to Japan — a 0% reduction in total import costs. Germany incurs $2,954 in duties on the $10,000 shipment, while Japan incurs $2,954. This difference compounds across larger order volumes and is a key factor in supplier selection decisions for importers sourcing auto parts components.
Frequently Asked Questions
The total effective tariff rate on auto parts components is 28% from Germany and 28% from Japan under current 2026 tariff policy. These rates include the MFN base rate, applicable Section 122 surcharge or bilateral deal rate, Section 232 duties for covered products, and Section 301 tariffs for Chinese goods. Use the CalcMyTariff.com calculator above to enter your specific invoice value and shipping details for a precise landed cost breakdown.
Germany does not have a formal trade agreement with the United States. Imports from Germany are subject to the standard Section 122 global surcharge of 15% on most goods, stacked on top of MFN base rates.
Japan has a bilateral trade deal with the US at a negotiated rate of 15%, which replaces the Section 122 rate for imports from Japan. This creates a differentiated tariff structure compared to non-deal countries.
Germany is cheaper for industrial machinery with a 17% total tariff rate, compared to 17% from Japan. On a $10,000 shipment, this 0% rate difference saves $0 in duties when sourcing from Germany.
Section 122, enacted in February 2026 for up to 150 days, imposes a global surcharge on most US imports. Germany is exempt from Section 122 for this product category. Japan's bilateral deal rate of 15% replaces Section 122. Note that Section 122 is scheduled to expire on July 24, 2026 — importers should model both current and post-expiry scenarios when planning shipments.