Sourcing comparison · Toys & Games
Tariff & fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.
| Annual import value | Estimated duty & fee savings / year |
|---|---|
| $50,000 | $5,275 |
| $250,000 | $26,375 |
| $1,000,000 | $105,500 |
Savings scale linearly with volume. Enter your exact figure to model it precisely.
Calculate your exact volume →When toys & games crosses a US border, where it was made now decides a surprising share of what it costs. Malaysia's 10% effective rate undercuts Vietnam's 20% by enough to free roughly $10,550 a year at $100,000 of volume. Where a competitor's margin erodes on the same tariff, a buyer who re-sources keeps the difference. Below, each tariff layer is laid out for both origins, with the saving scaled to several order sizes.
Both stacks share the same customs valuation, so the comparison is apples to apples. From Vietnam, the entry is assessed a 0% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty and a 20% negotiated bilateral rate on its toys & games, an effective 20% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. Shipped out of Malaysia, the product is hit with a 0% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty and a 10% Section 122 reciprocal surcharge on its toys & games, an effective 10% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. The Section 122 layer here is the reciprocal surcharge introduced in 2026; because it expires mid-year, the ranking it produces is worth re-checking after it lifts. Two charges are origin-blind — the MPF and HMF, together $49.74 on this entry — which is why the entire difference lives in the duty layers. The per-shipment gap comes to $1,055.00 on $10,000 of goods — a clean read on the 10% rate difference. Across a year that is roughly $2,637 on a $25,000 purchase order and about $10,550 on a $100,000 program. Per $25,000 order, $2,637 separates the two origins — small per shipment, compounding fast across a program.
The category, HTS 9503, 9504, takes in Action figures, Dolls, Board games, and LEGO-style bricks among other toys & games. For toys & games, where buyers reorder frequently, the duty rate compounds into one of the largest controllable costs on the P&L. From Asia-Pacific, Vietnam's top US-bound categories include consumer electronics, clothing garments, and footwear. A bilateral deal swaps Vietnam's Section 122 surcharge for a negotiated rate, reshaping how its toys & games stack is built. From Asia-Pacific, Malaysia's top US-bound categories include consumer electronics, semiconductors chips, and rubber. With no preferential deal in force, Malaysia toys & games faces the standard rates plus any applicable surcharge. With both origins in Asia-Pacific, freight lanes and transit times are broadly similar, so duty is the cleanest variable to compare. Malaysia clears this category at a structurally lower rate than Vietnam, an edge that persists across order cycles rather than a spot-price blip. With the US running its highest average tariff in decades, concentrated exposure to one high-duty origin is now a measurable annual cost rather than an abstract risk.
For $100,000 a year of toys & games, the move from Vietnam to Malaysia is worth about $10,550, scaling to $5,275 at $50,000, $26,375 at $250,000, and $105,500 at $1,000,000. The comparison is generated by running the same inputs through the tariff engine for each origin, which keeps everything but the duty layers equal. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier. Treat the annual saving as the ceiling on switching cost: as long as moving to Malaysia costs less than that, the change is accretive. Request parallel quotes from your Vietnam incumbent and a vetted Malaysia source, then compare landed cost with the duty gap held constant. Time the switch with the policy calendar in mind — the post-Section-122 picture can favour a different origin entirely. Run your own volume — and a post-Section-122 view — through the interactive Tariff Savings Finder. One origin still carries the Section 122 surcharge, due to expire mid-2026; the ranking can shift once it lapses.
At $100,000 of annual import value, switching from Vietnam to Malaysia saves an estimated $10,550 in duties and fees, because the effective tariff rate falls from 20% to 10%. The saving scales linearly with volume. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.
Malaysia-origin toys & games is assessed a 0% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty and a 10% Section 122 reciprocal surcharge, for an effective 10% duty rate before the Merchandise Processing Fee ($36.55) and Harbor Maintenance Fee ($13.19).
Vietnam carries an effective 20% rate versus 10% for Malaysia. The gap comes from differences in the base, Section 122, Section 232 and bilateral rates that apply to each origin.
Possibly. One of these origins currently carries the Section 122 reciprocal surcharge, which is scheduled to expire in mid-2026. The Tariff Savings Finder lets you toggle a post-expiry view to see whether the ranking shifts once that surcharge is removed.
Tariff rates from Tax Foundation, USITC, and Penn Wharton Budget Model. Last verified May 13, 2026.