Section 122 Global Tariff Surcharge Enacted: 10% on Most US Imports (Federal Register 2026-03824)
What Changed
Effective February 24, 2026President enacted Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 on February 24, 2026, imposing a global surcharge on most US imports. The Federal Register published a 10% proclaimed rate (2026-03824, Feb 25, 2026), while the President announced 15% via Truth Social on February 22, 2026. The surcharge is temporary — it expires 150 days from enactment, on July 24, 2026. USMCA-qualifying goods and Section 232-covered products are exempt.
Rate Changes
| Item | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Most global imports | 0% (no S122) | 10% S122 surcharge (per FedReg 2026-03824) |
| USMCA-qualifying goods (Canada/Mexico) | 0% | 0% (exempt from S122) |
Who's Affected
Virtually all US importers of non-USMCA, non-S232 goods. A $100,000 shipment now costs an additional $10,000 in Section 122 duties (operational rate per Federal Register 2026-03824; the 15% rate announced via Truth Social on February 22, 2026 was never operationalized). Exporters from all countries except Canada and Mexico (for qualifying goods) are affected. The surcharge particularly impacts importers from countries without bilateral deals, such as Australia, Brazil, and Southeast Asian nations not covered by deals.
Analysis
Section 122 Global Tariff Surcharge Enacted: 10% on Most US Imports (Federal Register 2026-03824) (effective 2026-02-24). President enacted Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 on February 24, 2026, imposing a global surcharge on most US imports. Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 grants the President limited authority to impose import surcharges for up to 150 days when the US balance of payments is in serious deficit. The authority has rarely been used in modern trade policy — its invocation in February 2026 came directly in response to the Supreme Court striking down IEEPA tariff authority on February 20, 2026, leaving the administration without a legal mechanism to maintain its tariff program. The proclamation imposed a uniform global surcharge on most US imports, with explicit exemptions for USMCA-qualifying goods from Canada and Mexico and for products already covered by Section 232 national security tariffs. The 150-day limit was statutory and could not be extended without Congressional action; with no extension passed (S.4049 was a repeal, not an extension), the surcharge lapsed by operation of law at 12:01 a.m. eastern time on July 24, 2026. The same moment, a forced-labor Section 301 duty (10% or 12.5% on roughly 60 economies) took effect and backfilled the lapse for most affected importers, so landed costs did not simply drop to the pre-surcharge level. Importers are advised to review their supply chains for USMCA qualification opportunities, which remain the most straightforward path to avoiding both the former Section 122 surcharge and the forced-labor Section 301 duty on Canadian and Mexican sourcing. The combination of the forced-labor Section 301 duty, Section 232 rates on steel and aluminum, and the China-specific Section 301 tariffs means the effective tariff rate for many importers remains substantially higher than at any point since 1947.
Impact & Next Steps
With Section 122 lapsed and a forced-labor Section 301 duty now the operative layer for ~60 economies, importers can minimize exposure by: (1) verifying USMCA qualification for Canadian and Mexican sourcing, as USMCA-qualifying goods are excluded from both the former surcharge and the forced-labor duty; (2) confirming whether your product categories fall under Section 232 coverage, which is likewise excluded from the forced-labor duty; (3) treating the forced-labor Section 301 duty (10% or 12.5% by economy) — not the lapsed Section 122 surcharge — as the operative layer when modeling landed cost, and checking whether your economy is on the 60-economy list at all. Customs brokers recommend reviewing Bills of Lading and entry documentation carefully to ensure applicable exclusions (headings 9903.05.90/.93/.94) are claimed.
Tariff rates from Tax Foundation, USITC, and Penn Wharton Budget Model; retaliatory and industry data from the ITA Foreign Retaliations Database and U.S. Census Bureau (NAICS). Last verified .