Sourcing comparison · Cleaning Products
Tariff & fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.
| Annual import value | Estimated duty & fee savings / year |
|---|---|
| $50,000 | $13,188 |
| $250,000 | $65,938 |
| $1,000,000 | $263,750 |
Savings scale linearly with volume. Enter your exact figure to model it precisely.
Calculate your exact volume →Buyers comparing China and Canada for cleaning products are really comparing two very different duty stacks. Goods from China clear at an effective 39%, while Canada clears the same category at 14% — about $26,375 a year at $100,000 of imports. For a category this exposed to surcharges, the sourcing map is effectively a pricing map. The sections that follow show where every dollar of the difference comes from.
Here is how US Customs builds the bill for each origin. Shipped out of China, the product is hit with a 4% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty, a 25% Section 301 surcharge, and a 10% Section 122 reciprocal surcharge on its cleaning products, an effective 39% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. On the Canada side, Customs applies a 4% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty, a 10% Section 122 reciprocal surcharge, and a 10% negotiated bilateral rate on its cleaning products, an effective 14% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. The decisive layer is Section 301: a 25% surcharge that applies only to China-origin goods and sits on top of every other duty, which is why China routes run expensive across so many categories. The reciprocal Section 122 charge is the most volatile element of this comparison, set to expire and therefore worth modelling in both states. The $49.74 in processing and harbor fees is the same on both sides, leaving the duty layers as the only mover of the gap. That leaves a $2,637.50 gap on every $10,000 of goods, driven entirely by the 25% spread in effective duty rate. That same per-dollar gap is about $6,594 on a $25,000 order and $26,375 on $100,000 of annual volume. At order level, $25,000 of goods carries roughly $6,594 more duty from China than from Canada.
cleaning products — Laundry detergent, Dish soap, All-purpose cleaners, and Disinfectants and similar goods — falls under HTS 3401, 3402, 3405. Because cleaning products moves in volume, even a modest per-unit duty gap aggregates into a number that decides sourcing strategy. China's trade profile leans toward consumer electronics, computers servers, and clothing garments, and it sits in Asia-Pacific. China has no agreement to soften the stack, so its cleaning products carries the full column-1 plus surcharge load. Canada's trade profile leans toward crude oil petroleum, passenger vehicles, and lumber wood products, and it sits in North America. USMCA lets compliant Canada cleaning products skip the duty stack other origins pay, provided rules of origin are satisfied. Spanning Asia-Pacific and North America, the two lanes differ in freight and transit, so weigh those against the duty saving. Canada is surfaced as a credible alternative, not just the cheapest line — it is among the origins a US buyer of cleaning products could realistically qualify. Sourcing diversification has shifted from resilience theatre to margin necessity, and a documented second source like Canada is how buyers act on it.
Anchor your own volume to these tiers: $13,188 at $50,000, $65,938 at $250,000, $263,750 at $1,000,000, and about $26,375 at $100,000. The numbers come straight from the landed-cost engine, with product cost and shipping fixed across both origins to isolate the tariff difference. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier. Read the $26,375 as a transition budget — if re-sourcing to Canada costs less than the annual saving, it pays back inside a year. Diligence on Canada is commercial, not regulatory: supplier capacity, MOQ, tooling and re-qualification cost — the duty advantage itself is already settled above. Re-run the figures close to your decision: the duty landscape for cleaning products has shifted repeatedly through the year. Use the Tariff Savings Finder to test your real numbers and see alternatives beyond Canada. One origin still carries the Section 122 surcharge, due to expire mid-2026; the ranking can shift once it lapses.
At $100,000 of annual import value, switching from China to Canada saves an estimated $26,375 in duties and fees, because the effective tariff rate falls from 39% to 14%. The saving scales linearly with volume. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.
Canada-origin cleaning products is assessed a 4% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty, a 10% Section 122 reciprocal surcharge, and a 10% negotiated bilateral rate, for an effective 14% duty rate before the Merchandise Processing Fee ($36.55) and Harbor Maintenance Fee ($13.19).
China carries an effective 39% rate versus 14% for Canada. The gap is driven mainly by the 25% Section 301 surcharge that applies to Chinese-origin goods and stacks on top of every other layer.
Possibly. One of these origins currently carries the Section 122 reciprocal surcharge, which is scheduled to expire in mid-2026. The Tariff Savings Finder lets you toggle a post-expiry view to see whether the ranking shifts once that surcharge is removed.
Tariff rates from Tax Foundation, USITC, and Penn Wharton Budget Model. Last verified May 13, 2026.