Sourcing comparison · Marine Vessels & Parts
Tariff & fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.
| Annual import value | Estimated duty & fee savings / year |
|---|---|
| $50,000 | $1,319 |
| $250,000 | $6,594 |
| $1,000,000 | $26,375 |
Savings scale linearly with volume. Enter your exact figure to model it precisely.
Calculate your exact volume →If your marine vessels & parts currently ships from South Korea, the duty bill is worth a second look. South Korea carries roughly 12.5% in duties and fees against 10% for Germany, a spread worth near $2,638 on $100,000 of annual volume. Two suppliers can quote the same factory price and still land at very different costs once Customs is done. Below, each tariff layer is laid out for both origins, with the saving scaled to several order sizes.
Both stacks share the same customs valuation, so the comparison is apples to apples. From South Korea, the entry is assessed a 1.5% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty and an 11% forced-labor Section 301 duty on its marine vessels & parts, an effective 12.5% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. Shipped out of Germany, the product is hit with a 1.5% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty and an 8.5% forced-labor Section 301 duty on its marine vessels & parts, an effective 10% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. Processing and harbor fees apply identically whichever country ships the goods ($49.74 here), confirming the saving is pure duty, not fee. That leaves a $263.75 gap on every $10,000 of goods, driven entirely by the 2.5% spread in effective duty rate. Scaled up, expect near $659 per $25,000 order and around $2,638 once annual buying reaches $100,000. At order level, $25,000 of goods carries roughly $659 more duty from South Korea than from Germany.
Within HTS 8901, 8902, 8903, 8904, 8905, 8906, 8907, marine vessels & parts includes Container ships, Bulk carriers, Yachts, Recreational boats, Outboard motors, Marine engines, and Vessel components. For marine vessels & parts, where buyers reorder frequently, the duty rate compounds into one of the largest controllable costs on the P&L. Jones Act requires US-built, US-flagged, US-crewed vessels for interstate commerce. Foreign vessels can operate in international routes. From Asia-Pacific, South Korea's top US-bound categories include consumer electronics, passenger vehicles, and steel iron products. For South Korea, a negotiated bilateral rate applies on marine vessels & parts entries alongside the base and Section 232/301 layers, now that Section 122 has lapsed to 0%. From Europe, Germany's top US-bound categories include passenger vehicles, industrial machinery, and pharmaceuticals. Germany trades under the EU bilateral framework, which shapes the duties on its marine vessels & parts. Different regions — Asia-Pacific versus Europe — mean shipping economics deserve a look beside the tariff math. Germany is surfaced as a credible alternative, not just the cheapest line — it is among the origins a US buyer of marine vessels & parts could realistically qualify. Because surcharges have stacked rates well above their statutory base, country of origin has become a first-order cost driver for marine vessels & parts rather than a footnote.
For $100,000 a year of marine vessels & parts, the move from South Korea to Germany is worth about $2,638, scaling to $1,319 at $50,000, $6,594 at $250,000, and $26,375 at $1,000,000. Every figure is produced by the same tariff engine behind the site's calculators, holding FOB value, freight and insurance constant so only the duty effect of origin shows through. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier. Treat the annual saving as the ceiling on switching cost: as long as moving to Germany costs less than that, the change is accretive. Request parallel quotes from your South Korea incumbent and a vetted Germany source, then compare landed cost with the duty gap held constant. Lock the comparison to a quote date; a surcharge added or lifted can change the ranking between negotiation and purchase order. Run your own volume — and a post-Section-122 view — through the interactive Tariff Savings Finder.
At $100,000 of annual import value, switching from South Korea to Germany saves an estimated $2,638 in duties and fees, because the effective tariff rate falls from 12.5% to 10%. The saving scales linearly with volume. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.
Germany-origin marine vessels & parts is assessed a 1.5% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty and an 8.5% forced-labor Section 301 duty, for an effective 10% duty rate before the Merchandise Processing Fee ($36.55) and Harbor Maintenance Fee ($13.19).
South Korea carries an effective 12.5% rate versus 10% for Germany. The gap comes from differences in the base, Section 232 and bilateral rates that apply to each origin.
Tariff rates from Tax Foundation, USITC, and Penn Wharton Budget Model; retaliatory and industry data from the ITA Foreign Retaliations Database and U.S. Census Bureau (NAICS). Last verified .