Sourcing comparison · Paper & Packaging

Switching paper & packaging sourcing from Brazil to Mexico

$29,013estimated duty & fee savings per year at $100,000 of imports
Rates last verified July 24, 2026

Tariff & fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.

How the saving scales with your volume

linear · equal FOB
Annual import valueEstimated duty & fee savings / year
$50,000$14,506
$250,000$72,531
$1,000,000$290,125

Savings scale linearly with volume. Enter your exact figure to model it precisely.

Calculate your exact volume →

The two tariff stacks, side by side

on a fixed reference customs value
BrazilCurrent source
Section 30125%
Forced-labor S30112.5%
MPF$36.55
HMF$13.19
Total duties & fees$4,005.99
MexicoCheaper
Section 3010%
Forced-labor S30110%
MPF$36.55
HMF$13.19
Total duties & fees$1,104.74

Few procurement levers move landed cost on paper & packaging as fast as switching country of origin. At 37.5%, Brazil sits well above Mexico's 10%; on $100,000 of annual buying that difference is around $29,013. Origin is one of the few cost levers a US importer controls outright, and it has rarely mattered more. What follows is the layer-by-layer comparison, the trade context behind each rate, and how the gap grows with volume.

How the tariff stacks compare

Here is how US Customs builds the bill for each origin. Shipped out of Brazil, the product is hit with a 25% Section 301 surcharge and a 12.5% forced-labor Section 301 duty on its paper & packaging, an effective 37.5% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. From Mexico, the entry is assessed a 10% forced-labor Section 301 duty on its paper & packaging, an effective 10% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. Because Section 301 adds 25% to Brazil entries and nothing to Mexico, that single measure accounts for most of the gap between the two stacks. Processing and harbor fees apply identically whichever country ships the goods ($49.74 here), confirming the saving is pure duty, not fee. That leaves a $2,901.25 gap on every $10,000 of goods, driven entirely by the 27.5% spread in effective duty rate. That same per-dollar gap is about $7,253 on a $25,000 order and $29,013 on $100,000 of annual volume. On a $25,000 purchase order that is about $7,253 of duty difference — the kind of figure that shows up directly in a quarter's gross margin.

Trade context

Within HTS 47, 48, 49, paper & packaging includes Corrugated cardboard, Kraft paper, Coated printing paper, Paper bags, Labels, Tissue paper, and Carton boxes. Because paper & packaging moves in volume, even a modest per-unit duty gap aggregates into a number that decides sourcing strategy. On carve-outs: USMCA-qualifying paper from Canada at 0%. Brazil's trade profile leans toward steel iron products, crude oil petroleum, and fresh produce, and it sits in South America. With no preferential deal in force, Brazil paper & packaging faces the standard rates plus any applicable surcharge. Mexico, in North America, ships the US mainly passenger vehicles, auto parts components, and consumer electronics. Through USMCA, qualifying Mexico paper & packaging enters duty-free (USMCA 0%, except Section 338 annex goods), collapsing the special-tariff layer to nothing. Different regions — South America versus North America — mean shipping economics deserve a look beside the tariff math. A switch to Mexico still hinges on capacity, certification and lead time, but the duty advantage is the part that is already quantified. Sourcing diversification has shifted from resilience theatre to margin necessity, and a documented second source like Mexico is how buyers act on it.

Recommendation

Where Mexico is a viable supplier, expect roughly $29,013 at $100,000, rising to about $72,531 at $250,000 and $290,125 at $1,000,000 as volume grows. These are engine-computed stacks, not estimates: identical inputs on both sides except country of origin, so the gap is purely a duty result. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier. If any price premium from Mexico is smaller than the duty saving, the switch still wins on net landed cost. Before acting, confirm the Mexico supplier classifies under the same HTS heading, can meet your volume and certifications, and faces no product-specific exclusion or quota that shifts the duty. Time the switch with the policy calendar in mind — the post-Section-122 picture can favour a different origin entirely. Open the Tariff Savings Finder to rank every feasible origin for your specific volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

At $100,000 of annual import value, switching from Brazil to Mexico saves an estimated $29,013 in duties and fees, because the effective tariff rate falls from 37.5% to 10%. The saving scales linearly with volume. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.

Mexico-origin paper & packaging is assessed a 10% forced-labor Section 301 duty, for an effective 10% duty rate before the Merchandise Processing Fee ($36.55) and Harbor Maintenance Fee ($13.19).

Brazil carries an effective 37.5% rate versus 10% for Mexico. The gap is driven mainly by the 25% Section 301 surcharge that applies to Chinese-origin goods and stacks on top of every other layer.

Disclaimer: CalcMyTariff.com provides tariff estimates for informational purposes only. Actual duty rates depend on the specific HTS classification of your goods, which requires professional customs brokerage expertise. Rates shown reflect our best interpretation of currently published tariff schedules and may not include all applicable duties, anti-dumping duties, countervailing duties, or special tariffs. Consult a licensed US customs broker for binding determinations. Tariff rates change frequently — verify current rates with CBP or USITC before making import decisions.

Tariff rates from Tax Foundation, USITC, and Penn Wharton Budget Model; retaliatory and industry data from the ITA Foreign Retaliations Database and U.S. Census Bureau (NAICS). Last verified .