Sourcing comparison · Toys & Games
Tariff & fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.
| Annual import value | Estimated duty & fee savings / year |
|---|---|
| $50,000 | $14,506 |
| $250,000 | $72,531 |
| $1,000,000 | $290,125 |
Savings scale linearly with volume. Enter your exact figure to model it precisely.
Calculate your exact volume →Sourcing toys & games is now a tariff decision as much as a supplier decision. Switch the origin from China (37.5%) to Mexico (10%) and an importer reclaims about $29,013 for every $100,000 purchased. Where a competitor's margin erodes on the same tariff, a buyer who re-sources keeps the difference. The sections that follow show where every dollar of the difference comes from.
Here is how US Customs builds the bill for each origin. Sourced from China, the goods face a 25% Section 301 surcharge and a 12.5% forced-labor Section 301 duty on its toys & games, an effective 37.5% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. On the Mexico side, Customs applies a 10% forced-labor Section 301 duty on its toys & games, an effective 10% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. The decisive layer is Section 301: a 25% surcharge that applies only to China-origin goods and sits on top of every other duty, which is why China routes run expensive across so many categories. The $49.74 in processing and harbor fees is the same on both sides, leaving the duty layers as the only mover of the gap. That leaves a $2,901.25 gap on every $10,000 of goods, driven entirely by the 27.5% spread in effective duty rate. Across a year that is roughly $7,253 on a $25,000 purchase order and about $29,013 on a $100,000 program. On a $25,000 purchase order that is about $7,253 of duty difference — the kind of figure that shows up directly in a quarter's gross margin.
Classified in HTS chapter 9503, 9504, toys & games spans products like Action figures, Dolls, Board games, LEGO-style bricks, Puzzles, Stuffed animals, and Outdoor play equipment. Demand for toys & games is broad and price-sensitive, which is exactly why a duty wedge of this size reshapes who can supply the US market competitively. For budgeting purposes: toy tariffs directly raise holiday and birthday gift prices for US families; Chinese manufacturers still supply ~80% of US toy market despite tariff pressures. China (Asia-Pacific) sends the United States largely consumer electronics, computers servers, and clothing garments. China has no agreement to soften the stack, so its toys & games carries the full column-1 plus surcharge load. Mexico's trade profile leans toward passenger vehicles, auto parts components, and consumer electronics, and it sits in North America. Under USMCA, Mexico-origin toys & games that meets the rules of origin can clear duty-free entirely (USMCA 0%, except Section 338 annex goods) — a decisive edge where qualification holds. Spanning Asia-Pacific and North America, the two lanes differ in freight and transit, so weigh those against the duty saving. Mexico clears this category at a structurally lower rate than China, an edge that persists across order cycles rather than a spot-price blip. Sourcing diversification has shifted from resilience theatre to margin necessity, and a documented second source like Mexico is how buyers act on it.
Anchor your own volume to these tiers: $14,506 at $50,000, $72,531 at $250,000, $290,125 at $1,000,000, and about $29,013 at $100,000. Every figure is produced by the same tariff engine behind the site's calculators, holding FOB value, freight and insurance constant so only the duty effect of origin shows through. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier. Read the $29,013 as a transition budget — if re-sourcing to Mexico costs less than the annual saving, it pays back inside a year. Diligence on Mexico is commercial, not regulatory: supplier capacity, MOQ, tooling and re-qualification cost — the duty advantage itself is already settled above. Lock the comparison to a quote date; a surcharge added or lifted can change the ranking between negotiation and purchase order. Use the Tariff Savings Finder to test your real numbers and see alternatives beyond Mexico.
At $100,000 of annual import value, switching from China to Mexico saves an estimated $29,013 in duties and fees, because the effective tariff rate falls from 37.5% to 10%. The saving scales linearly with volume. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.
Mexico-origin toys & games is assessed a 10% forced-labor Section 301 duty, for an effective 10% duty rate before the Merchandise Processing Fee ($36.55) and Harbor Maintenance Fee ($13.19).
China carries an effective 37.5% rate versus 10% for Mexico. The gap is driven mainly by the 25% Section 301 surcharge that applies to Chinese-origin goods and stacks on top of every other layer.
Tariff rates from Tax Foundation, USITC, and Penn Wharton Budget Model; retaliatory and industry data from the ITA Foreign Retaliations Database and U.S. Census Bureau (NAICS). Last verified .