Sourcing comparison · Sporting Goods
Tariff & fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.
| Annual import value | Estimated duty & fee savings / year |
|---|---|
| $50,000 | $16,089 |
| $250,000 | $80,444 |
| $1,000,000 | $321,775 |
Savings scale linearly with volume. Enter your exact figure to model it precisely.
Calculate your exact volume →When sporting goods crosses a US border, where it was made now decides a surprising share of what it costs. Taiwan's 10% effective rate undercuts China's 40.5% by enough to free roughly $32,177 a year at $100,000 of volume. For a category this exposed to surcharges, the sourcing map is effectively a pricing map. Below, each tariff layer is laid out for both origins, with the saving scaled to several order sizes.
The duty layers tell the whole story of the gap. From China, the entry is assessed a 3% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty, a 25% Section 301 surcharge, and a 12.5% forced-labor Section 301 duty on its sporting goods, an effective 40.5% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. Sourced from Taiwan, the goods face a 3% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty and a 7% forced-labor Section 301 duty on its sporting goods, an effective 10% once the $49.74 in processing fees are added. China carries a 25% country-specific Section 301 duty, a punitive layer that compounds on top of the ordinary tariff and has no equivalent on the Taiwan side. Because the MPF and HMF ($49.74 combined) track customs value rather than origin, they wash out of the comparison entirely. That leaves a $3,217.75 gap on every $10,000 of goods, driven entirely by the 30.5% spread in effective duty rate. Across a year that is roughly $8,044 on a $25,000 purchase order and about $32,177 on a $100,000 program. At order level, $25,000 of goods carries roughly $8,044 more duty from China than from Taiwan.
Sporting Goods (HTS 9506, 9507) covers items such as Exercise bikes, Treadmills, Gym equipment, Bicycles, Fishing rods, Camping gear, and Team sports equipment. Demand for sporting goods is broad and price-sensitive, which is exactly why a duty wedge of this size reshapes who can supply the US market competitively. Concretely, what counts as sporting goods: exercise equipment, fitness machines, sporting goods, outdoor recreation equipment, fishing gear, camping equipment, and related sporting accessories. From Asia-Pacific, China's top US-bound categories include consumer electronics, computers servers, and clothing garments. Absent a trade deal, China's sporting goods is assessed standard duties and whatever surcharges apply. A Asia-Pacific supplier, Taiwan concentrates its US exports in semiconductors chips, computers servers, and consumer electronics. Taiwan trades under a negotiated bilateral rate that applies alongside the base and Section 232/301 layers, with Section 122 at 0% since its 2026-07-24 lapse — reshaping how its sporting goods stack is built. With both origins in Asia-Pacific, freight lanes and transit times are broadly similar, so duty is the cleanest variable to compare. Taiwan is surfaced as a credible alternative, not just the cheapest line — it is among the origins a US buyer of sporting goods could realistically qualify. With the US running its highest average tariff in decades, concentrated exposure to one high-duty origin is now a measurable annual cost rather than an abstract risk.
For $100,000 a year of sporting goods, the move from China to Taiwan is worth about $32,177, scaling to $16,089 at $50,000, $80,444 at $250,000, and $321,775 at $1,000,000. All values are calculated, not assumed — the engine applies the current published rates to identical goods and reports the difference. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier. Treat the annual saving as the ceiling on switching cost: as long as moving to Taiwan costs less than that, the change is accretive. Request parallel quotes from your China incumbent and a vetted Taiwan source, then compare landed cost with the duty gap held constant. Time the switch with the policy calendar in mind — the post-Section-122 picture can favour a different origin entirely. Run your own volume — and a post-Section-122 view — through the interactive Tariff Savings Finder.
At $100,000 of annual import value, switching from China to Taiwan saves an estimated $32,177 in duties and fees, because the effective tariff rate falls from 40.5% to 10%. The saving scales linearly with volume. These figures reflect tariff and fee savings only, assuming equal product cost — your actual landed cost also depends on price and freight, which vary by supplier.
Taiwan-origin sporting goods is assessed a 3% Most-Favoured-Nation base duty and a 7% forced-labor Section 301 duty, for an effective 10% duty rate before the Merchandise Processing Fee ($36.55) and Harbor Maintenance Fee ($13.19).
China carries an effective 40.5% rate versus 10% for Taiwan. The gap is driven mainly by the 25% Section 301 surcharge that applies to Chinese-origin goods and stacks on top of every other layer.
Tariff rates from Tax Foundation, USITC, and Penn Wharton Budget Model; retaliatory and industry data from the ITA Foreign Retaliations Database and U.S. Census Bureau (NAICS). Last verified .