Importing EV Batteries from Canada into the United States in 2026 carries a total effective tariff of 28.4% (MFN 3.4% + Section 232 25%). That figure is the stacked rate applied to the customs value before fees. The 25% Section 232 duty applies to a battery that is a part of a passenger vehicle or light truck (heading 9903.94.05); a battery that is not such a part, and a USMCA-eligible part from Canada or Mexico, enters under heading 9903.94.06 with no Section 232 duty. Use the calculator below for the exact landed cost, including Merchandise Processing and Harbor Maintenance fees.
Calculate Your Landed Cost
Adjust values for EV Batteries from Canada
How Tariffs Stack
Each layer adds to the total cost — amounts based on customs value
Full Landed Cost Breakdown
Based on a $10,000 ocean shipment (FOB value)
How the Tariff Rate is Calculated
The tariff structure for ev batteries follows the US stacking formula: the MFN base rate of 3.4%, plus Section 232 duty of 25%. The special tariff layer (the highest of Section 122, Section 232, or bilateral rates) is 25%, which combines with the MFN base to produce a subtotal before Section 301 duties. Adding all layers yields a total tariff rate of 28.4%. On a customs value of $10,600.00, this translates to total duties of $3,010.40, plus the Merchandise Processing Fee of $36.72 and Harbor Maintenance Fee of $13.25. The total landed cost including all fees reaches $13,660.37.
Trade Context
The United States imported $420B in goods from Canada in 2024, making it a significant trading partner in the North America region. Key import categories from Canada include crude oil petroleum, passenger vehicles, lumber wood products, reflecting the country's industrial and agricultural strengths. EV Batteries represents an important segment of this trade relationship, with demand driven by both price competitiveness and product availability in the US market. The bilateral trade volume underscores the economic significance of tariff policy decisions affecting imports from Canada.
What Section 122's Lapse Means for This Import
Section 122 lapsed on July 24, 2026, but imports of ev batteries from Canada are governed by Section 232 tariffs, which were excluded from the Section 122 surcharge. The 25% Section 232 duty applies independently and is likewise excluded from the forced-labor Section 301 duty that took effect the same day. Importers of ev batteries should plan around the Section 232 rate as the primary additional tariff layer.
Alternative Sourcing Countries for EV Batteries
Importers looking for lower tariff costs on ev batteries may consider sourcing from Mexico (effective rate 28.4%); Germany (effective rate 28.4%); Japan (effective rate 28.4%). Compared to Canada's total effective rate of 28.4%, these alternatives offer potential cost savings depending on the specific product classification and applicable trade agreements. Each alternative carries its own tariff structure, so importers should calculate the full landed cost before switching suppliers.
Related Context
Tariff Timeline for Canada
Proclamations 11061 (alcoholic beverages), 11062 (whey, molasses and non-alcoholic beer) and 11063 (motorcycles over 800 cc) ban importation of the goods on their own annexes, effective for goods imported into the United States on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on September 29, 2026. Goods imported but not yet entered for consumption before that instant remain subject to the pre-existing 50 percent Section 338 duty instead of the ban.
Proclamations 11064 (91 Fed. Reg. 58331, FR Doc. 2026-18838) and 11065 (91 Fed. Reg. 58339, FR Doc. 2026-18839) modify the scope of Canada's alcohol and motor-vehicle-grievance Section 338 annexes at 12:01 a.m. eastern time on September 15, 2026, and — for the first time — make those two duties apply in addition to duties imposed under Section 232, narrowing the HTSUS note 51(c) carve-out to the dairy heading (9903.03.13) alone. Proclamation 11065's Part A adds passenger vehicle lines 8703.10.50 and 8703.21.01 to the motor-vehicle-grievance annex, which now stack Section 338 on top of Section 232 for those lines.
Three Section 338 proclamations against Canada take effect at 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 22, 2026 (announced for August 19; Proclamation 11056 suspended it for three days) — Proclamation 11046 (alcoholic beverages), 11047 (dairy) and 11048 (motor vehicles). Each imposes an additional 50 percent ad valorem duty on its own annexed list of Canadian goods, each answers a different Canadian trade practice, and none of them reached goods already subject to Section 232 duties until September 15, 2026. The duty applies even to USMCA-qualifying goods: the HTSUS Rates of Duty 1-Special subcolumn reads 'The duty provided in the applicable subheading + 50%', making Section 338 the first authority to survive a USMCA preference claim.
The Section 232 action on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients took effect for the companies listed in Annex III to Proclamation 11020, with all remaining companies following on September 29, 2026. The duty is 100 percent ad valorem on patented pharmaceuticals and associated pharmaceutical ingredients, reduced to 20 percent for companies with onshoring plans approved by the Secretary (rising to 100 percent on April 2, 2030), 15 percent for Japan, the European Union, the Republic of Korea, and Switzerland and Liechtenstein jointly, and 10 percent for the United Kingdom. Generic pharmaceuticals and their associated ingredients, including biosimilar products, are expressly excluded.
The Section 301 forced-labor import duties were challenged at the U.S. Court of International Trade. The duties remain in effect pending the court's review; no injunction or stay has been issued.
Section 301 forced-labor import duties took effect at 12:01 a.m. eastern time on sixty investigated economies (10% on 17, 12.5% on 38, conditional net-of-MFN for EU/Taiwan at 10% and Japan/South Korea/Switzerland at 12.5%). Additive layer stacking on China's existing punitive Section 301; excludes Section 232 products and USMCA-qualifying goods.
Section 122 uniform 10% global surcharge lapsed to 0% by operation of law after its 150-day statutory limit (19 U.S.C. §2132). No Congressional extension was enacted (S.4049 is a repeal, not an extension); the CAFC appeal remains unresolved.
Proclamation 11045 established a Section 232 onshoring incentive for primary aluminum. It imposes no duty and changes no rate — the word 'percent' does not appear in its operative text. A company whose onshoring plan the Secretary approves may annually import a quantity of primary aluminum matching its planned U.S. facility's reasonably anticipated annual output at half the Section 232 rate otherwise in effect. Plans must commit to starting construction by January 20, 2029, refurbishment adjustments are capped at the value of the investment, and benefits may be rescinded — retroactively where fraud is found. Any HTSUS changes are left to a future Federal Register notice from the Secretary. The benefit is company-specific, quantity-limited and conditional, so 50 percent remains the correct rate for an ordinary importer.
The Section 232 investigation into commercial aircraft, jet engines, and aircraft/engine parts concluded that imports threaten to impair national security, but the President imposed NO tariff. The proclamation instead directs a 180-day negotiation window (through approximately January 5, 2027), continued monitoring, and reserves the possibility of alternative remedies in the future.
Proclamation 11032 adjusted the aluminum, steel and copper regimes without changing the 50 percent full-value rate. It expanded the temporarily-reduced 15 percent derivative tier to agricultural equipment and certain predominantly-residential HVAC systems and components; lowered the threshold for qualifying as made 'entirely' from American aluminum, steel or copper from 95 percent to 85 percent; and provided that for products of Canada and Mexico qualifying for USMCA preferential treatment, a 25 percent duty applies only to the non-U.S. content of the product.
Showing 10 of 23 events
Frequently Asked Questions
The current total tariff rate on EV Batteries from Canada is 28.4%. This is composed of the following layers: MFN base rate: 3.4%; Section 232 duty: 25%. The effective tariff rate after all layers is 28.4%.
For a $10,000 shipment of EV Batteries from Canada, you can expect to pay approximately $2,840.00 in total duties at the current rate of 28.4%. Additional fees include the Merchandise Processing Fee (MPF) and, for ocean shipments, the Harbor Maintenance Fee (HMF). The total landed cost for a $10,000 order would be approximately $12,840.00, representing an effective cost increase of 28.4% over the FOB price. Use our tariff calculator for precise calculations based on your specific shipment value and shipping method.
No, EV Batteries is subject to Section 232 tariffs instead of Section 122. Products covered under Section 232 national security tariffs are excluded from the Section 122 surcharge. For ev batteries from Canada, the Section 232 rate is 25%, on top of the 3.4% MFN rate.
Section 122 lapsed on July 24, 2026, but EV Batteries from Canada is governed by Section 232 national-security tariffs rather than Section 122. Section 232 products were excluded from the Section 122 surcharge, and they are likewise excluded from the forced-labor Section 301 duty that took effect the same day. The Section 232 rate of 25% continues to apply, so the total rate of 28.4% was not changed by the lapse.
For EV Batteries, alternative sourcing countries to consider instead of Canada include Mexico (effective rate: 28.4%), Germany (effective rate: 28.4%), Japan (effective rate: 28.4%). Compared to Canada's total effective rate of 28.4%, these alternatives may offer lower landed costs depending on the specific HTS classification. Use our country comparison tool to see a detailed side-by-side analysis of tariff costs.